As a history fan, I read a lot of non-fiction history books and love to listen to podcasts that review key moments/events across the centuries and across geographies. Listening to a recent WW2 podcast, the concept of “Dash or Dither” was explored it caught my attention. The podcast was reviewing key events early in the war when both the British and German armies invaded Norway… and without realizing it they invaded at the exact same time. I won’t take any time today to discuss the military or historic elements specific to these events, but the podcast hosts were discussing that one set of Generals/senior officers were incredibly slow/ planful/ deliberate as they approached the operation, while the opposing Generals/senior officers acted swiftly/impulsively/rashly against the same objectives. The hosts used the “Dash vs Dither” language in their description, and it got me thinking about the application of this idea in the business leadership context.
To begin with, let’s start with a few definitions:
“Dash”: verb, “To run or move quickly or hastily
“Dither”: verb, “to act nervously or indecisively”
In our cultural context today, it is easy and potentially natural to praise the “dash” in a leader’s approach, and to critique those leaders who “dither.” In my experience leading large organizations, it can be at minimum distracting, often actually dangerous for teams to actually see a senior leader “dither” (to be uncertain, having a hard time making a tough decision, vacillate between competing strategic alternatives, etc.) Equally it is troublesome and also dangerous to “see” senior leaders unthinkingly “dash” toward solutions that are ill considered or even ill-advised.
It’s in this context that I came to realize that neither “Dash” nor “Dither” SINGULARLY are the right or appropriate leadership tempos… instead a nuanced blend between the two seems to be the better, more balanced approach. Back in 2012, I wrote an essay titled “Over the hood and over the horizon” ( https://fylegacy.blogspot.com/2012/04/over-hood-over-horizon.html) sharing the story of a lesson that I was taught about how leaders ALWAYS have to toggle their viewpoints between short term tactical/executional dynamics and longer-term strategic considerations. Literally earlier this week I shared this story in a coaching conversation I was having with a young leader who works together with me on a non-profit board. It dawned on me that in the same fashion of “over the hood and over the horizon,” successful leaders need to become agile and comfortable at a wide variety of leadership tempos… dependent on the circumstances. There will be moments where a market-based opportunity presents itself and a leader MUST accelerate an organization to capture the moment. Equally, a leader MUST remember the lessons from another old essay of mine titled “P/B/R” ( https://fylegacy.blogspot.com/2009/07/pbr-maybe-not-what-you-think.html) where I shared an important lesson of leaders needing to learn how to “Pause, Breathe, and Reconnect.”
The art of great leaders is neither to “dash” nor “dither” unilaterally …. but to be able to navigate the landscape and lead organizations at a wide range of tempos, best oriented to capture the opportunities that are present, or avoid the dangerous pitfalls that abound.











